Deep attribution research
Veriso shows its reasoning: alternate readings, competing hypotheses with their evidence, and a research path to follow. A structured starting point, not a conclusion.
Use cases
Scholarly research
Provenance chain
Style analysis
Comparison and verification tools
Each hypothesis is checked against independent data before it is offered.
- Competing hypotheses, each with its confidence level and evidence
- Chronology verification: the artist's life dates against the work's apparent period
- Visually similar works and museum references (Met, Joconde, Europeana…)
- Research path: sources and institutions to consult next (Collector)
- Follow-up questions on the report (1 per work on Collector, 3 on Pro)
Working method
- 1
Document
Sharp photos of the signature, back and labels.
- 2
Compare
Weigh the hypotheses and their evidence.
- 3
Follow up
Follow the research path to archives and specialists.
Limits to keep in mind
- Results are produced by AI models and can contain errors: always check primary sources.
- Veriso does not consult archives, catalogues raisonnés or non-public sales records.
Frequently asked questions
Can I cite a Veriso report?
Cite it as a preliminary, AI-generated opinion, never as an authoritative source. Check every point against primary sources.
Where do artist references come from?
Public authorities (Getty ULAN, Wikidata), open museum collections and our own artist index.
See the sources →Does Veriso read non-Latin signatures?
Signatures in Cyrillic, Greek and Arabic script are detected and transcribed in their original script. Chinese, Japanese and Korean scripts are not supported yet.
Put a hypothesis to the test
Start with a free analysis and examine the evidence behind every conclusion.